The resistance against the rule of non-Muslims over Muslims has a valid revelation. One of the most important of these bases is verse 141 of Surah Nisa, which is the basis of the jurisprudential ...
Read More
The resistance against the rule of non-Muslims over Muslims has a valid revelation. One of the most important of these bases is verse 141 of Surah Nisa, which is the basis of the jurisprudential rule of denying the rule of infidels over Muslims. Based on this, doing any action that leads to the superiority of infidels over Muslims , it has legal respect.The investigation carried out in the present research shows that most of the contemporary Shia and Sunni commentators, unlike their predecessors, have seriously paid attention to the political and social implications of this Quranic doctrine by developing the meaning of negating the domination of the infidels over Muslims.The purpose of the current research is to explain the evolution in understanding the political and social implications of the verse of denial of domination and to examine its factors (issue) with a descriptive and analytical method (method). Two important factors can be stated for this change of approach.The first factor is the dominance of Western governments over large parts of the Islamic world.This problem has caused reformers and religious thinkers to try to find a way out of find it.The second factor is the efforts of Muslim jurists, especially Shiite jurists, in forming protest movements against foreign rule based on this Quranic principle (findings) as one of the most important religious bases of negating the rule of non-Muslims over Muslims.
